On This Day In History 1066 – The Battle of Stamford Bridge #Anthology #13Writers #OneBattle

On This Day In History 1066 – The Battle of Gate Fulford (well, yesterday. I’m a day late)

The Battle of Stamford Bridge

On this day in history, the battle that many say brought the Viking Age to an end (in England at least) was fought between two Harolds/Haralds not far from York. SPOILERS. The English Harold won, the Norwegian Harald lost his life, and you can read all about it in the new anthology available NOW. (Read on to find out about the previous battle of Gate Fulford and to find out who Harald Hardrada was.

https://books.vikingauthors.com/1066

Information about the events of the Battle of Stamford Bridge in September 1066, including themes like conflict and England's fate.

What was the battle of Gate Fulford, or Fulford Gate?

The battle took place on 20th September 1066, between the Norwegian forces led by Harald Hardrada and the English forces commanded by the two brother earls, and was the first of three battles in 1066, which eventually ended Saxon England, and brought about the beginning of the Norman era (Boo).

Having arrived near York two days earlier, Harald Hardrada had his first encounter with the forces of the English, led by two young earls, Morcar and Edwin (Eadwine) of the House of Mercia, at Gate Fulford. Morcar was earl of Northumbria, replacing the disgraced Tostig Godwineson (who had enticed Hardrada to England), while Edwin was the earl of Mercia, succeeding to the position after the death of his father Ælfgar, who’d held Mercia after his father Leofric. (Fans of the Earls of Mercia series will so far have only encountered Morcar and Eadwine as children).

The image shows a close-up of the cover for the Stamford Bridge Anthology, focusing on the bridge and the river dividing the two armies.

Their youth, their inexperience, and the perceived defeat in this terrible battle are all that people know about Edwin and Morcar. What’s so often overlooked is that they marched into battle determined to counter the might of what many believe was the last great Viking warrior, and they were also the king’s brothers by marriage; their sister now married to Harold Godwineson. They also survived the battle and probably fought at Stamford Bridge and Hastings.

So, who was Harald Hardrada?

Hardrada was king of Norway, half-brother to St Olaf, who was killed at the battle of Stiklestad in 1030 by forces loyal to King Cnut, who’d claimed Norway as part of his determination to rule much of Scandinavia. Harald was forced to flee and spent many years fighting in the Varangian guard until he decided to advance his claims to the kingship once more (in 1045), initially forging an alliance with Sweyn of Denmark (nephew of King Cnut) until allying with King Magnus of Norway, who was his nephew, and somewhat conveniently, died only the next year, making Harald the sole king of Norway. (You will find some of this story told in my Earls of Mercia series, and also in Lady Estrid, the story of Sweyn of Denmark’s mother).

Image shows a close up of the Stamford Bridge Anthology focusing on a helmet like the ones worn in the battle, with a nose guard and no horns.

Why did he invade England in 1066?

It is from the alliance with King Magnus that Harald Hardrada exerted his right to rule England, as Magnus stated he had a claim, having earlier agreed it with King Harthacnut of England (Cnut’s son), that he (Magnus) would rule England after Harthacnut’s death and equally that Harthacnut would rule Norway after Magnus’ death.

Harald adopted the claim as he did the kingdom of Norway after Magnus’ death. Admittedly, the intervention of the disgruntled Tostig Godwineson probably also encouraged him. (To read about Harald’s life, check out JC Duncan’s fab five-part series covering his life).

And so, the man lauded as the last great Viking made his way to England, and on this day, he first encountered the English resistance. And while most say the brother earls were defeated, I wonder if the narrative should be a little different. After all, their brother by marriage, their king, was already on his way north to counter the threat. Did they do what needed to be done? Did they temporarily halt the Norwegian invasion and buy Harald time to bring his warriors to the battle…

Book cover for '1066 Stamford Bridge: A Viking Anthology' featuring a Viking helmet at the top, with the title prominently displayed and a backdrop of an army with shields in the background.

The Stamford Bridge Anthology

Thirteen writers. One battle. The same afternoon, told from both sides of the bridge.

Giles Kristian · Matthew Harffy · Angus Donald · Tim Hodkinson · Peter Gibbons · MJ Porter · Justin Hill · Theodore Brun · Eric Schumacher · Will Dowling · M. Thomas Kingsley · Mark Oxbrow · Åsli & Bakkejord

On 25 September 1066, a Norwegian army lay resting on both banks of the Derwent, seven miles from York. They had beaten one English army five days earlier and taken the city’s surrender, and the fighting was done. Most of them had left their mail at the ships.

They were not expecting Harold Godwinson.

The battle that followed ended the Viking age in England. Three weeks later it helped decide a second one, on a hill near Hastings, that everyone remembers instead.

A king who has spent his life outrunning the end of an age. A skald asked to praise a man he no longer believes in. A priest tends the wounded on the eve of a battle nobody knows is coming. A lone axeman on the bridge, and the Englishman in the water beneath him. Afterwards, a farmer walks the field looking for his son, and twenty years later an old earl sits in a Norman prison, still deciding what to tell his gaoler.

The man who holds the bridge in one story is watched from the water in another. Thirteen stories, one day.

Over 100,000 words of Viking historical fiction, published on the 960th anniversary of the battle.

Now available

Text from a creative writing piece discussing historical fiction, featuring themes of storytelling between characters like a Norwegian king and an English reeve.

I’m welcoming Ancestral Virgins by Fiona J MacKintosh to the blog, with a fab guest post #historicalfiction #blogtour #nonfiction

I’m welcoming Ancestral Virgins by Fiona J MacKintosh to the blog, with a fab guest post #historicalfiction #blogtour #nonfiction

Why Write about the Past? 

Historical fiction has been around as long as there have been novels. In 1859, Charles Dickens published The Tale of Two Cities, which was set during the French Revolution. Thackeray’s Vanity Fair came out in 1849, 34 years after the historic events it portrayed including the Battle of Waterloo. And Walter Scott went even further back in his 1819 novel Ivanhoe to the reign of Richard the Lionheart in 12th century England.  

My recently published historical novel, Ancestral Virgins, is set in Britain a little over a century ago in the period before, during, and after the Great War. It was a time – like now – when new technologies were overturning the old realities at a rapid pace as the telephone, the car, and the airplane came into regular use. In one scene in the novel, the guests at a dinner party in a Sussex manor house rush outside to look up at the night sky, trying to spot a Zeppelin on a test flight above southern England. 

“Someone shouted ‘Look!’ and a long slim shadow moved out from behind a cloud and stole very slowly across the open sky, sliding out of sight behind another cloud. ‘How can there be people up there in that thing?’ Tessa whispered.”

Today, most of us see planes crisscrossing the sky every day, but for those people in 1914, who would never before have seen anything up there but birds, the sight of that metal tube bearing humans high above the earth must have been both amazing and terrifying. 

Capturing that lost sense of newness about things we now take for granted is one reason why I write historical fiction. 

Another reason is that as the Spanish-American philosopher George Santayana famously said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” History can be reexamined just as legitimately by the novelist as by the non-fiction writer, because fiction can take us deep into the minds and emotions of people who lived through real events of the past. 

To take an example from Ancestral Virgins, George Ingham, a young British explosives expert working for the de Beers diamond company in South Africa, finds himself trapped in Kimberley during its long siege by the Boers. Food supplies run short, and soon the townspeople are barely getting by on “mealie pap, horseflesh, and the occasional vegetable from the de Beers kitchen garden.” Ingham and the woman with whom he’s in love lie awake at nights talking about the meals that they’re craving. 

“Ingham described the Sunday dinners his mother made on special occasions – roast beef, a little pink, with roasted potatoes, carrots, and parsnips in parsley and gravy, with warm yeasty bread crowned with knobs of melting butter. In the moonlight, he could see a gleam of saliva at the corner of Ottilie’s mouth.”  

The starvation during the siege is a historical fact; the fantasies of food are how I imagined that it was experienced by those who lived through it. 

But imagination alone is not enough when writing realist historical fiction. It must always build on what is already there – otherwise known as the facts. I can attest that my descriptions of the historical events in Ancestral Virgins are based on a huge amount of research. For that Kimberley chapter alone, I memorized the entire map of the town by heart as well as a week-by-week digest of what happened during the four-month siege and bombardment. It’s not the quickest way to write a novel, but you learn an enormous amount and the grounding that the research gives you is invaluable for imagining your way inside the heads of your characters and to experience the sights, sounds, and smells that they would have seen, heard, and smelled. 

I do this work because I hope that you, the reader, can also feel like you’re in that Sussex garden in 1914 looking up at the night sky or in that dusty South African wartime town in 1899. I want us to go back there together, right alongside the characters I’ve made up from my imagination. 

This is my overriding motivation for why I write historical fiction – so that, however briefly, we can feel the way our ancestors felt within their own lifetimes when they had no conception of all the history that was still to come.     

Promotional graphic for the blog tour of 'Ancestral Virgins' by Fiona J. Mackintosh, featuring a vintage-style portrait of a woman with a gold headpiece and delicate attire.

Here’s the blurb

In early 20th century Britain, society was changing rapidly, but not much was changing for women. From different ends of the social spectrum, Celia Mapperley and May Hallam wrestle with rules and circumstances beyond their control and must navigate love, sex, war, and the thin line between conformity and scandal. As they each bear the shame of a devastating family secret, their stories come together in ways that neither could have imagined.    

Book cover of 'Ancestral Virgins' by Fiona J. Mackintosh featuring a portrait of a young woman with long hair and ornate attire.

Purchase Link

https://books2read.com/rl/ancestralvirgins

Meet the author

Fiona J. Mackintosh is a Scottish-American author living in Washington D.C. whose fiction draws from both sides of the Atlantic. Her flash fiction collection, The Yet Unknowing World (Ad Hoc Fiction, 2021), was a runner-up for the 2021 Saboteur Award for best short story collection, and her debut novel Ancestral Virgins will be published on June 26, 2026. Her flashes were selected for Best Small Fictions in 2023 and 2019, and her short stories have been finalists in the Cairde Word, Colm Toíbín, Bristol, Galley Beggar, Exeter, and Fish Short Story Prizes. She is a proud recipient of an Individual Artist’s Award from the Maryland State Arts Council. www.fionajmackintosh.com

Image of author Fiona J Makintosh wearing a denim jacket andblack polo neck jumper

https://linktr.ee/Fionajanemack

Promotional graphic for the book 'Ancestral Virgins' by Fiona J. Mackintosh, featuring a woman in period attire, with publication dates listed for various book reviews from September 19th to 25th.

On This Day In History 1066 – The Battle of Gate Fulford (well, yesterday. I’m a day late)

On This Day In History 1066 – The Battle of Gate Fulford (well, yesterday. I’m a day late)

What was the battle of Gate Fulford,or Fulford Gate?

The battle took place on 20th September 1066, between the Norwegian forces led by Harald Hardrada and the English forces commanded by the two brother earls, and was the first of three battles in 1066, which eventually ended Saxon England, and brought about the beginning of the Norman era (Boo).

Having arrived near York two days earlier, Harald Hardrada had his first encounter with the forces of the English, led by two young earls, Morcar and Edwin (Eadwine) of the House of Mercia, at Gate Fulford. Morcar was earl of Northumbria, replacing the disgraced Tostig Godwineson (who had enticed Hardrada to England), while Edwin was the earl of Mercia, succeeding to the position after the death of his father Ælfgar, who’d held Mercia after his father Leofric. (Fans of the Earls of Mercia series will so far have only encountered Morcar and Eadwine as children).

Their youth, their inexperience, and the perceived defeat in this terrible battle are all that people know about Edwin and Morcar. What’s so often overlooked is that they marched into battle determined to counter the might of what many believe was the last great Viking warrior, and they were also the king’s brothers by marriage; their sister now married to Harold Godwineson. They also survived the battle and probably fought at Stamford Bridge and Hastings.

So, who was Harald Hardrada?

Hardrada was king of Norway, half-brother to St Olaf, who was killed at the battle of Stiklestad in 1030 by forces loyal to King Cnut, who’d claimed Norway as part of his determination to rule much of Scandinavia. Harald was forced to flee and spent many years fighting in the Varangian guard until he decided to advance his claims to the kingship once more (in 1045), initially forging an alliance with Sweyn of Denmark (nephew of King Cnut) until allying with King Magnus of Norway, who was his nephew, and somewhat conveniently, died only the next year, making Harald the sole king of Norway. (You will find some of this story told in my Earls of Mercia series, and also in Lady Estrid, the story of Sweyn of Denmark’s mother).

An infographic titled 'On This Day in History, 1066' discussing the events leading up to the Battle of Stamford Bridge, featuring a central image of a Viking helmet and mentioning 13 authors and stories related to the events.

Why did he invade England in 1066?

It is from the alliance with King Magnus that Harald Hardrada exerted his right to rule England, as Magnus stated he had a claim, having earlier agreed it with King Harthacnut of England (Cnut’s son), that he (Magnus) would rule England after Harthacnut’s death and equally that Harthacnut would rule Norway after Magnus’ death.

Harald adopted the claim as he did the kingdom of Norway after Magnus’ death. Admittedly, the intervention of the disgruntled Tostig Godwineson probably also encouraged him. (To read about Harald’s life, check out JC Duncan’s fab five-part series covering his life).

And so, the man lauded as the last great Viking made his way to England, and on this day, he first encountered the English resistance. And while most say the brother earls were defeated, I wonder if the narrative should be a little different. After all, their brother by marriage, their king, was already on his way north to counter the threat. Did they do what needed to be done? Did they temporarily halt the Norwegian invasion and buy Harald time to bring his warriors to the battle…

Book cover for '1066 Stamford Bridge: A Viking Anthology' featuring a Viking helmet at the top, with the title prominently displayed and a backdrop of an army with shields in the background.

The Stamford Bridge Anthology

Thirteen writers. One battle. The same afternoon, told from both sides of the bridge.

Giles Kristian · Matthew Harffy · Angus Donald · Tim Hodkinson · Peter Gibbons · MJ Porter · Justin Hill · Theodore Brun · Eric Schumacher · Will Dowling · M. Thomas Kingsley · Mark Oxbrow · Åsli & Bakkejord

On 25 September 1066, a Norwegian army lay resting on both banks of the Derwent, seven miles from York. They had beaten one English army five days earlier and taken the city’s surrender, and the fighting was done. Most of them had left their mail at the ships.

They were not expecting Harold Godwinson.

The battle that followed ended the Viking age in England. Three weeks later it helped decide a second one, on a hill near Hastings, that everyone remembers instead.

A king who has spent his life outrunning the end of an age. A skald asked to praise a man he no longer believes in. A priest tends the wounded on the eve of a battle nobody knows is coming. A lone axeman on the bridge, and the Englishman in the water beneath him. Afterwards, a farmer walks the field looking for his son, and twenty years later an old earl sits in a Norman prison, still deciding what to tell his gaoler.

The man who holds the bridge in one story is watched from the water in another. Thirteen stories, one day.

Over 100,000 words of Viking historical fiction, published on the 960th anniversary of the battle.

Releasing 25th September 2026 – preorder now in ebook. Paperback available now.

Text from a creative writing piece discussing historical fiction, featuring themes of storytelling between characters like a Norwegian king and an English reeve.